WHAT DO WE MEAN WHEN WE SPEAK
OF THE QUEENSHIP OF MARY?
From the writing of Thomas Merton1
◊◊◊
Mary alone, of all the saints, is, in everything, incomparable. She has the
sanctity of them all and yet resembles none of them. And still, we can talk of
being like her. This likeness to her is not only something to desire — it is one
human quality most worthy of our desire: but the reason for that is that she, of
all creatures, most perfectly recovered the likeness to God that God willed to
find, in varying degrees, in us all.
It is necessary, no doubt, to talk about her privileges as if they were
something that could be made comprehensible in human language and could
be measured by some human standard. It is most fitting to talk about her as a
Queen and to act as if you knew what it meant to say she has a throne above all
the angels. But this should not make anyone forget that her highest privilege is
her poverty and her greatest glory is that she is most hidden, and the source of
all her power is that she is as nothing in the presence of Christ, of God.
This is often forgotten by Catholics themselves, and therefore it is not
surprising that those who are not Catholic often have a completely wrong
conception of Catholic devotion to the Mother of God. They imagine, and
sometimes we can understand their reasons for doing so, that Catholics treat
the Blessed Virgin as an almost divine being in her own right, as if she had some
glory, some power, some majesty of her own that placed her on a level with
Christ himself. They regard the Assumption of Mary into heaven as a kind of
apotheosis and her Queenship as a strict divinization.11
Hence her place in the Redemption would seem to be equal to that of her
Son. But this is all completely contrary to the true mind of the Catholic Church.
It forgets that Mary’s chief glory is her nothingness, in the fact of being the
“Handmaid of the Lord,” as one who in becoming the Mother of God acted
simply in loving submission to his command, in the pure obedience of faith. She
is blessed not because of some mythical pseudo-divine prerogative, but in all
her human and womanly limitations as one who has believed. It is the faith and
the fidelity of this humble handmaid, “full of grace” that enables her to be the
perfect instrument of God, and nothing else but his instrument. The work that
was done in her was purely the work of God. “He that is mighty has done great
things in me.” The glory of Mary is purely and simply the glory of God in her,
and she, like anyone else, can say that she has nothing that she has not received
from him through Christ.
As a matter of fact, this is precisely her greatest glory: that having nothing
of her own, retaining nothing of a “self” that could glory in anything for her own
sake, she placed no obstacle to the mercy of God and in no way resisted his love
and his will. Hence, she received more from him than any other saint. He was
able to accomplish his will perfectly in her, and his liberty was in no way
hindered or turned from its purpose by the presence of an egotistical self in
Mary. She was and is in the highest sense a person precisely because, being
“immaculate,” she was free from every taint of selfishness that might obscure
God’s light in her being. She was then a freedom that obeyed him perfectly and,
in this obedience, found the fulfillment of perfect love.