MARY’S VIRGINITY
From the writing of Lucien Legrand
◊◊◊
The significance of Mary’s virginity is entirely different from both cultic
virginity and philosophical continence. Mary knows that her virginity has no
value of its own and no power but that of the Spirit. She does not speak of the
greatness of her virginity. For her, it is not virginity that makes her great: it is
the Lord. As far as she is concerned, she is nothing and her virginity seals her
nothingness. Because she is a virgin, she is ‘poor’, a contemptible thing,
considered worthless by the world.
Of course, in the case of Mary as in that of the ‘Poor of Yahweh’ in the Old
Testament, poverty should be taken in the biblical sense. It is not merely
negative. It does not mean only destitution. As we find it in the life of the great
biblical figures such as Jeremiah, Job the anawim in the Psalms and the
Suffering Servant in Isaiah, poverty is a religious attitude which underlies the
spiritual development of the Old Testament and prepares the way for the
abasement of the cross, the imprint of which it bears by anticipation.
Biblical poverty does indeed mean life deprived of any human hope but
also and mostly at its deepest, radical detachment, total humility and
consequently utter confidence in God. Mary’s virginity belongs to this type of
poverty. It is a form of that religious attitude made up of faith and abandon, joy
and confidence; it is akin to humility and can be summarized as an attitude of
religious expectation. It is silence, readiness, emptiness. And her greatness
comes from the faith and confidence in god which spring in the heart on that
emptiness, and from the answer God gave to that faith and confidence.
Virginity of this kind differs entirely from its pagan counterparts. It does
not represent an attempt to substitute our influence for God’s power: on the
contrary, Mary has no other ambition than to be the handmaid of the Lord.
Neither does Mary’s virginity correspond to a merely human longing for purity
and moral greatness. Her virginity does not belong so much to the moral as to
the theological virtues. It manifests an attitude before god rather than an effort
of moral perfection and of self-achievement. Luke’s Gospel of the Infancy does
not describe in Mary a heroic form of the virtue of chastity. What it sees in her is
sheer faith and hope which has no reliance in creatures but is entirely turned
toward God.